AI won’t replace journalism: verification, trust and accountability remain key, say media leaders

AI may change how journalism is practised and monetised, but credibility, human judgement and institutional responsibility will remain its defining strengths.
AI won’t replace journalism: verification, trust and accountability remain key, say media leaders
Updated on
2 min read

Artificial intelligence is steadily altering newsroom workflows, but it will not replace journalism’s core pillars of trust, verification and accountability. That was the central message from media executives at the India AI Impact Summit 2026, where leaders debated how AI is influencing news production, business models and the quality of public discourse.

At a panel titled ‘AI and Media: Opportunity, Responsibility, and the Road Ahead’, speakers agreed that AI should strengthen journalism — not supplant it.

Trust, accountability

Mohit Jain, chief operating officer and executive director of Bennett Coleman Group, said editorial discretion and verification remain foundational in a country as diverse as India.

He emphasised that journalism is not merely about distributing information, but about:

  • Curating trust

  • Providing context

  • Accepting moral and legal responsibility

As AI begins to commoditise information, Jain argued, trust will become scarce — and scarcity will create value. Human oversight, he added, is not a legacy feature but a structural necessity for sustaining credible public discourse.

He also underlined the strategic importance of the news sector, noting that foreign direct investment in news carries caps because of its potential influence on elections, national security and market stability.

Warning against ‘AI slop’

Kalli Purie, vice-chairperson and executive editor-in-chief of India Today Group, raised concerns about the rapid rise of unverified AI-generated content.

According to her, current AI systems are not producing accountable journalism. Instead, they risk generating what she termed “AI slop” — content that appears credible but lacks institutional backing.

Key risks she highlighted:

  • Illusion of trust without accountability

  • Scale-driven misinformation

  • Erosion of editorial standards

She stressed the need for a clear human imprint on AI-assisted journalism.

AI as a newsroom enabler

Tanmay Maheshwari, managing director of Amar Ujala, said his organisation sees AI as a complementary technology.

For his group, AI is being used to:

  • Deepen reporting

  • Enhance content value

  • Improve efficiency

He clarified that AI is not being viewed as a replacement for editorial teams but as a tool to augment human capability.

Driving subscriptions and retention

LV Navaneeth, chief executive officer of The Hindu, said media trust is produced by institutions, not by technology platforms.

He noted that AI is being deployed to improve subscription revenues through propensity models aimed at boosting retention. However, he stressed that accountability for incorrect content ultimately rests with the publisher — irrespective of whether AI tools are involved.

The broader takeaway from the summit was clear: AI may change how journalism is practised and monetised, but credibility, human judgement and institutional responsibility will remain its defining strengths.

Related Stories

No stories found.
logo
DhanamOnline English
english.dhanamonline.com