The Trump administration’s tough stance on H-1B visas has sparked fresh debate in the US, with Vice President JD Vance linking the policy to what he calls “true Christian politics” that puts American workers first.
Speaking at the Turning Point USA convention, Vance defended the move as a moral and economic choice aimed at protecting jobs and labour dignity at home.
Vance argued that Christian values should guide economic and labour policy, not just social issues. According to him, a government guided by faith-based principles must care about who benefits from growth and whether workers are treated fairly. “A true Christian politics,” he said, should shape the government’s entire approach, including employment and immigration policies.
Framing the H-1B debate as an ethical issue, Vance said the administration believes meaningful work deserves respect and protection. He questioned why companies that move jobs overseas or rely heavily on foreign labour should be rewarded, arguing that such practices often sideline American workers in favour of cheaper alternatives.
He explained that the administration tightened skilled worker visa rules, including H-1B visas, because it viewed the practice of bypassing domestic workers as unfair. According to Vance, these decisions were taken without waiting for Congress as the administration felt it had a moral responsibility to act quickly in defence of local employment.
The H-1B visa programme allows US companies to hire foreign professionals in specialised fields such as technology, engineering and finance. Critics of the crackdown argue that it could worsen skill shortages, especially in the technology sector. Supporters, however, say it helps prevent wage suppression and protects domestic jobs.
Meanwhile, foreign affairs expert Robinder Sachdev noted that many of the Trump administration’s policy decisions, including changes to the H-1B programme, have faced legal challenges. Around 20 US states have contested the sharp rise in H-1B visa fees, he said. Despite this, several of the administration’s actions have ultimately been upheld by US courts.
The debate highlights the growing tension between protecting local employment and meeting the workforce needs of a globalised economy.
(By arrangement with livemint.com)
